May 29 2008
Wired’s 10 Inconvenient Truths
So, per one of my commenters (thanks, Drake!), I took a look at Wired’s article detailing out 10 ideas that are heresies in the current environmental movement that we should all be taking a look anyway. So, always the slave to the Man telling me what to do (even when he’s telling me what to do about what not to do), I read the article. My brief thoughts on each of the 10:
1. Live in Cities: Urban Living Is Kinder to the Planet Than the Suburban Lifestyle
This actually doesn’t surprise me at all - the suburban lifestyle requires a lot of automobile driving, a lot of factors to bring in food in. It is just less efficient. But don’t confuse “rural” with suburban. I think rural life is probably even better, but it just isn’t efficient enough for the size of our population.
2. A/C Is OK: Air-Conditioning Actually Emits Less C02 Than Heating
Ummm, ok? I’m not sure what the point of this was. We should all move to Arizona? It may take more energy to run the heat, but water usage in the hot areas has its own environmental concern.
3. Organics Are Not the Answer: Surprise! Conventional Agriculture Can Be Easier on the Planet
2 valid points here: Eating less meat is more environmentally friendly and eating local is better than eating Big Organics. But using these two points to extrapolate to the Abandon Organics In Favor of Conventional Agriculture seems silly.
4. Farm the Forests: Old-Growth Forests Can Actually Contribute to Global Warming
I’ve got no problem with this one - manage the forests as appropriate. You don’t have to deforest them, just prune them. And those forests which are monuments of nature, like the Sequoias? Leave those be.
5. China Is the Solution: The People’s Republic Leads the Way in Alternative-Energy Hardware
Another one that is not particularly shocking. China has the most people in the world and so they have, for a variety of reasons, some of the biggest reasons to be creating green energy solutions. The question is: Will China export all these solutions only and turn China into freeways and cars? If so, the advantage of all this green technology coming out of China would be nullified by the CO2 from a billion people hitting the highway.
6. Accept Genetic Engineering: Superefficient Frankencrops Could Put a Real Dent in Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Law of Unintended Consequences bother me here. We don’t really understand food - how it affects us and deciding that we can make super crops to solve our problems seems like it might end up backfiring on us in the future.
7. Carbon Trading Doesn’t Work: Carbon Credits Were a Great Idea, But the Benefits Are Illusory
This one is just plain silly. I don’t know whether carbon credits are a fantastic idea or not, but I do know that it is way too early in the process to have any idea whether the system is working. Yeah, a bunch of celebrities abuse the idea to make themselves feel better, but it doesn’t mean it can’t work. We have a professor who is joint at Fuqua and the Nicholas School of the Environment and his focus is going to be on emerging carbon markets. We’re just getting started, folks.
8. Embrace Nuclear Power: Face It. Nukes Are the Most Climate-Friendly Industrial-Scale Form of Energy
I’ve got no real problems with nuclear power. I don’t want to abandon pouring lots of new resources into solar, wind, geothermal, and other extremely clean power sources, but it doesn’t hurt to look at nuclear power to replace some coal fired power plants. Nuclear’s biggest concern is potential terrorist attacks - nuclear plants have a much bigger target on them. Also, random thought: why don’t we just launch spent nuclear waste and material into the sun every so often? Seriously, what are the factors that keep that from happening?
9. Used Cars — Not Hybrids:Don’t Buy That New Prius! Test-Drive a Used Car Instead
One of the comments on this article pointed to a Sierra Club article that exposed a lot of the flaws in the information that the Wired article uses to make this comparison. And yes, a used car will oftentimes get almost as good mileage as a Hybrid…but it is also putting out a lot more pollution. A Hybrid gives you the benefit of using less gas and of putting out less emissions both.
10. Prepare for the Worst: Climate Change Is Inevitable. Get Used to It
This has some points - using technology to help us adapt to the changes that are surely coming is a good idea. It needs to be in conjunction with doing what we can to slow things down as well though. We can’t just expect technology to be our Deus Ex Machina. Well, maybe Wired does, after all, that is their purview.
Summary:
All in all, most of these short little pieces were lazy writing with very few solid points. Mostly, overall, the articles fail to take the complexity of the issues in hand. “Pastured cows take more to produce the same amount of meat and produce more methane, therefore corn fed cows are the correct solution!” I just felt that it was overall way too focused on climate change, which is obviously the elephant in the room - that doesn’t mean that we should be ignoring all other environmental issues on the way to correcting our poor carbon emitting habits.
What do you folks think? Is climate change big enough to push other issues aside?

In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto